Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix vs Great value, potato chips, original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix

Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Great value, potato chips, original

Great value, potato chips, original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
520 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
18g
Sugars
3.6g
38g
Fat
35.7g
18g
Protein
3.6g
1.2g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix and Great value, potato chips, original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix is the clear winner. With 51 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix contains significantly more sugar (18g) compared to the milder Great value, potato chips, original (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Great value, potato chips, original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix offers a protein boost with 18g per 100g, outperforming Great value, potato chips, original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix or Great value, potato chips, original?

It depends on your goals. Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix has 520 calories, while Great value, potato chips, original has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix vegan?

No, Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet and Spicy Trail Mix and Great value, potato chips, original?

There is a difference of 51 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.