Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak vs GROUND CHICKEN

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak

Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of GROUND CHICKEN

GROUND CHICKEN

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
129.4 kcal
Energy
142.9 kcal
5.9g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
8g
16.5g
Protein
19.6g
2g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak and GROUND CHICKEN side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak is the clear winner. With 13 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak contains significantly more sugar (5.8823529411765g) compared to the milder GROUND CHICKEN (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, GROUND CHICKEN is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak or GROUND CHICKEN?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak has 129.41176470588 calories, while GROUND CHICKEN has 142.857142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak vegan?

No, Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak and GROUND CHICKEN?

There is a difference of 13 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.