Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak vs pork rinds salt and vinegar
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak
pork rinds salt and vinegar
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak and pork rinds salt and vinegar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak is the clear winner. With 442 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak contains significantly more sugar (5.8823529411765g) compared to the milder pork rinds salt and vinegar (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, pork rinds salt and vinegar is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak or pork rinds salt and vinegar?
It depends on your goals. Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak has 129.41176470588 calories, while pork rinds salt and vinegar has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak vegan?
No, Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak and pork rinds salt and vinegar?
There is a difference of 442 calories per 100g between the two products.
