Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms vs Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms

Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla

Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
562 kcal
Energy
38 kcal
37.5g
Sugars
6.7g
37.5g
Fat
1g
0g
Protein
0.4g
0.3g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms and Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms is the more energy-dense option here, packing 524 more calories per 100g than Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms contains significantly more sugar (37.5g) compared to the milder Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla (6.67g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms or Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla?

It depends on your goals. Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms has 562 calories, while Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla has 38 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms vegan?

No, Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms and Shelf Stable Almondmilk Vanilla?

There is a difference of 524 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.