Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Garleek vs Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Garleek

Sweet Garleek

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt

Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
91.7 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
1.7g
Sugars
0g
5.4g
Fat
21.4g
1.7g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Garleek and Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Garleek is the clear winner. With 372 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Garleek contains significantly more sugar (1.67g) compared to the milder Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Garleek or Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Garleek has 91.7 calories, while Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Garleek vegan?

No, Sweet Garleek is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Garleek and Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 372 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.