Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Gherkins vs The Original Malted Milk Balls

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sweet Gherkins

Sweet Gherkins

Not Vegan
VS
Package of The Original Malted Milk Balls

The Original Malted Milk Balls

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
616 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
117g
0g
Fat
37.5g
0g
Protein
4.2g
1.5g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Gherkins and The Original Malted Milk Balls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Gherkins is the clear winner. With 473 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Sweet Gherkins takes the lead with only 32.1g of sugar per 100g, whereas The Original Malted Milk Balls contains 117g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Gherkins or The Original Malted Milk Balls?

Sweet Gherkins appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Sweet Gherkins vegan?

No, Sweet Gherkins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Gherkins and The Original Malted Milk Balls?

There is a difference of 473 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.