Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Gherkins vs Sliced Almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Gherkins

Sweet Gherkins

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced Almonds

Sliced Almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
567 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
3.3g
0g
Fat
50g
0g
Protein
20g
1.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Gherkins and Sliced Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Gherkins is the clear winner. With 424 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Gherkins contains significantly more sugar (32.1g) compared to the milder Sliced Almonds (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced Almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Gherkins or Sliced Almonds?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Gherkins has 143 calories, while Sliced Almonds has 567 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Gherkins vegan?

No, Sweet Gherkins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Gherkins and Sliced Almonds?

There is a difference of 424 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.