Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Gherkins vs wheat Thins

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Gherkins

Sweet Gherkins

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of wheat Thins

wheat Thins

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
449 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
14.3g
0g
Fat
16.3g
0g
Protein
6.1g
1.5g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Gherkins and wheat Thins side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Gherkins is the clear winner. With 306 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Gherkins contains significantly more sugar (32.1g) compared to the milder wheat Thins (14.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, wheat Thins is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Gherkins or wheat Thins?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Gherkins has 143 calories, while wheat Thins has 449 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Gherkins vegan?

No, Sweet Gherkins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Gherkins and wheat Thins?

There is a difference of 306 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.