Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet & hot beef jerky vs Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet & hot beef jerky

Sweet & hot beef jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells

Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
170 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
2g
5.4g
Fat
13g
32.1g
Protein
6g
2.5g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet & hot beef jerky and Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet & hot beef jerky is the more energy-dense option here, packing 116 more calories per 100g than Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet & hot beef jerky contains significantly more sugar (28.6g) compared to the milder Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells (2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet & hot beef jerky offers a protein boost with 32.1g per 100g, outperforming Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet & hot beef jerky or Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells?

It depends on your goals. Sweet & hot beef jerky has 286 calories, while Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells has 170 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet & hot beef jerky vegan?

No, Sweet & hot beef jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet & hot beef jerky and Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells?

There is a difference of 116 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.