Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings vs Lay's Kettle Cooked Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings

Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lay's Kettle Cooked Original

Lay's Kettle Cooked Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
252 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
11.3g
Sugars
0g
13.5g
Fat
0g
13.8g
Protein
0g
1.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings and Lay's Kettle Cooked Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings is the more energy-dense option here, packing 252 more calories per 100g than Lay's Kettle Cooked Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings contains significantly more sugar (11.3g) compared to the milder Lay's Kettle Cooked Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lay's Kettle Cooked Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings offers a protein boost with 13.8g per 100g, outperforming Lay's Kettle Cooked Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings or Lay's Kettle Cooked Original?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings has 252 calories, while Lay's Kettle Cooked Original has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings vegan?

No, Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Peach Heat Chicken Wings and Lay's Kettle Cooked Original?

There is a difference of 252 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.