Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Plantain Chips vs KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Plantain Chips

Sweet Plantain Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS

KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
0g
21.4g
Fat
28.6g
3.6g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Plantain Chips and KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Plantain Chips is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Plantain Chips contains significantly more sugar (32.142857142857g) compared to the milder KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Plantain Chips or KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Plantain Chips has 500 calories, while KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Plantain Chips vegan?

No, Sweet Plantain Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Plantain Chips and KETTLE CHIPS ORIGINAL SEA SALT KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.