Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash vs Nature'S Promise, Organic Whole Grain Animal Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash

Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nature'S Promise, Organic Whole Grain Animal Cookies

Nature'S Promise, Organic Whole Grain Animal Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
60 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
0g
Sugars
23.3g
0g
Fat
15g
1g
Protein
6.7g
0.1g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash and Nature'S Promise, Organic Whole Grain Animal Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash is the clear winner. With 407 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nature'S Promise, Organic Whole Grain Animal Cookies contains 23.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash or Nature'S Promise, Organic Whole Grain Animal Cookies?

Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash vegan?

No, Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Potato And Butternut Squash Hash and Nature'S Promise, Organic Whole Grain Animal Cookies?

There is a difference of 407 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.