Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Potato Chips vs Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Potato Chips

Sweet Potato Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano

Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
28.9 kcal
14.3g
Sugars
3.3g
32.1g
Fat
0g
3.6g
Protein
0.8g
0.6g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Potato Chips and Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet Potato Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 507 more calories per 100g than Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Potato Chips contains significantly more sugar (14.3g) compared to the milder Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano (3.31g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet Potato Chips offers a protein boost with 3.57g per 100g, outperforming Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Potato Chips or Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Potato Chips has 536 calories, while Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano has 28.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Potato Chips vegan?

No, Sweet Potato Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Potato Chips and Diced Tomatoes Basil, Garlic & Oregano?

There is a difference of 507 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.