Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt vs Masoor Malka

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt

Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Masoor Malka

Masoor Malka

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
354 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
2.1g
32.1g
Fat
2.1g
3.6g
Protein
22.9g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt and Masoor Malka side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 182 more calories per 100g than Masoor Malka. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt contains significantly more sugar (10.7g) compared to the milder Masoor Malka (2.08g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Masoor Malka is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt or Masoor Malka?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt has 536 calories, while Masoor Malka has 354 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt vegan?

No, Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Potato Chips Sea Salt and Masoor Malka?

There is a difference of 182 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.