Sweet potato crinkle cut chips vs Muscat Gummy Candy
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sweet potato crinkle cut chips
Muscat Gummy Candy
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sweet potato crinkle cut chips and Muscat Gummy Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sweet potato crinkle cut chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 236 more calories per 100g than Muscat Gummy Candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Sweet potato crinkle cut chips takes the lead with only 17.857142857143g of sugar per 100g, whereas Muscat Gummy Candy contains 57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Sweet potato crinkle cut chips offers a protein boost with 3.5714285714286g per 100g, outperforming Muscat Gummy Candy in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sweet potato crinkle cut chips or Muscat Gummy Candy?
It depends on your goals. Sweet potato crinkle cut chips has 535.71428571429 calories, while Muscat Gummy Candy has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sweet potato crinkle cut chips vegan?
No, Sweet potato crinkle cut chips is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sweet potato crinkle cut chips and Muscat Gummy Candy?
There is a difference of 236 calories per 100g between the two products.
