Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips vs Picon california sweet roll
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips
Picon california sweet roll
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips and Picon california sweet roll side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 255 more calories per 100g than Picon california sweet roll. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips contains significantly more sugar (21.4g) compared to the milder Picon california sweet roll (16.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Picon california sweet roll is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips or Picon california sweet roll?
It depends on your goals. Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips has 607 calories, while Picon california sweet roll has 352 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips vegan?
No, Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips and Picon california sweet roll?
There is a difference of 255 calories per 100g between the two products.
