Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet & salty kettle corn vs Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet & salty kettle corn

Sweet & salty kettle corn

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter

Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464.3 kcal
Energy
431 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
18.5g
25g
Fat
16.9g
3.6g
Protein
15.4g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet & salty kettle corn and Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet & salty kettle corn is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet & salty kettle corn contains significantly more sugar (28.571428571429g) compared to the milder Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter (18.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet & salty kettle corn or Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter?

It depends on your goals. Sweet & salty kettle corn has 464.28571428571 calories, while Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter has 431 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet & salty kettle corn vegan?

No, Sweet & salty kettle corn is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet & salty kettle corn and Organic Macrobar Blueberry + Cashew Butter?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.