Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet & salty kettle corn vs Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet & salty kettle corn

Sweet & salty kettle corn

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles

Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464.3 kcal
Energy
236 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
9.1g
25g
Fat
7.3g
3.6g
Protein
5.5g
1.2g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet & salty kettle corn and Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet & salty kettle corn is the more energy-dense option here, packing 228 more calories per 100g than Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet & salty kettle corn contains significantly more sugar (28.571428571429g) compared to the milder Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles (9.09g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet & salty kettle corn or Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles?

It depends on your goals. Sweet & salty kettle corn has 464.28571428571 calories, while Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles has 236 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet & salty kettle corn vegan?

No, Sweet & salty kettle corn is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet & salty kettle corn and Thick & Fluffy Whole Grain Blueberry Waffles?

There is a difference of 228 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.