Head-to-Head Analysis

sweet & sour chicken vs Colmans original english mustard

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of sweet & sour chicken

sweet & sour chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Colmans original english mustard

Colmans original english mustard

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
15g
Sugars
10g
0.8g
Fat
12g
1.7g
Protein
10g
1.8g
Salt
9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing sweet & sour chicken and Colmans original english mustard side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, sweet & sour chicken is the clear winner. With 100 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. sweet & sour chicken contains significantly more sugar (15g) compared to the milder Colmans original english mustard (10g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Colmans original english mustard is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: sweet & sour chicken or Colmans original english mustard?

It depends on your goals. sweet & sour chicken has 100 calories, while Colmans original english mustard has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is sweet & sour chicken vegan?

No, sweet & sour chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between sweet & sour chicken and Colmans original english mustard?

There is a difference of 100 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.