Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips vs No Pulp Orange Juice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips

Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of No Pulp Orange Juice

No Pulp Orange Juice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
45.8 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
9.2g
25g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0.8g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips and No Pulp Orange Juice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 454 more calories per 100g than No Pulp Orange Juice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips contains significantly more sugar (10.71g) compared to the milder No Pulp Orange Juice (9.17g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, No Pulp Orange Juice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming No Pulp Orange Juice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips or No Pulp Orange Juice?

It depends on your goals. Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips has 500 calories, while No Pulp Orange Juice has 45.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips vegan?

No, Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips and No Pulp Orange Juice?

There is a difference of 454 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.