Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice vs Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice

Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood

Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1780 kcal
Energy
88.9 kcal
311g
Sugars
3.3g
0g
Fat
0g
44.5g
Protein
6.7g
0.1g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice and Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1691 more calories per 100g than Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice contains significantly more sugar (311g) compared to the milder Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice offers a protein boost with 44.5g per 100g, outperforming Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice or Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice has 1780 calories, while Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood has 88.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice vegan?

No, Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice and Leg Style Crab Flavored Seafood?

There is a difference of 1691 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.