Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice vs Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice

Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable

Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1780 kcal
Energy
160 kcal
311g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
44.5g
Protein
40g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice and Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1620 more calories per 100g than Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice contains significantly more sugar (311g) compared to the milder Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice offers a protein boost with 44.5g per 100g, outperforming Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice or Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice has 1780 calories, while Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable has 160 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice vegan?

No, Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Soy Sauce for Rice and Sushi Nori Toasted Sea Vegetable?

There is a difference of 1620 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.