Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet & Spicy Peanuts vs California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet & Spicy Peanuts

Sweet & Spicy Peanuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
0g
46.4g
Fat
10g
25g
Protein
0.9g
1.8g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet & Spicy Peanuts and California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet & Spicy Peanuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 471 more calories per 100g than California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet & Spicy Peanuts contains significantly more sugar (10.7g) compared to the milder California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet & Spicy Peanuts offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet & Spicy Peanuts or California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium?

It depends on your goals. Sweet & Spicy Peanuts has 571 calories, while California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet & Spicy Peanuts vegan?

No, Sweet & Spicy Peanuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet & Spicy Peanuts and California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium?

There is a difference of 471 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.