Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added vs Chicken caesar salad kit for one

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added

Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken caesar salad kit for one

Chicken caesar salad kit for one

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
56 kcal
Energy
141.2 kcal
4g
Sugars
1.2g
0.8g
Fat
7.7g
1.6g
Protein
10g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added and Chicken caesar salad kit for one side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added is the clear winner. With 85 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added contains significantly more sugar (4g) compared to the milder Chicken caesar salad kit for one (1.18g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken caesar salad kit for one is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added or Chicken caesar salad kit for one?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added has 56 calories, while Chicken caesar salad kit for one has 141.18 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added vegan?

No, Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Whole Kernel Golden Corn NO Salt Added and Chicken caesar salad kit for one?

There is a difference of 85 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.