Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon vs Sea Salt Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon

Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Potato Chips

Sea Salt Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
379 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
34.5g
Sugars
0g
3.5g
Fat
35.7g
6.9g
Protein
3.6g
1.3g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon and Sea Salt Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon is the clear winner. With 157 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon contains significantly more sugar (34.48g) compared to the milder Sea Salt Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon offers a protein boost with 6.9g per 100g, outperforming Sea Salt Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon or Sea Salt Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon has 379 calories, while Sea Salt Potato Chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon vegan?

No, Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweetened cereal with apple & cinnamon and Sea Salt Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 157 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.