Sweetened Condensed Milk vs 2% Reduced Fat Milk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sweetened Condensed Milk
2% Reduced Fat Milk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sweetened Condensed Milk and 2% Reduced Fat Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sweetened Condensed Milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 383 more calories per 100g than 2% Reduced Fat Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweetened Condensed Milk contains significantly more sugar (73.33g) compared to the milder 2% Reduced Fat Milk (5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 2% Reduced Fat Milk is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Sweetened Condensed Milk offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming 2% Reduced Fat Milk in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sweetened Condensed Milk or 2% Reduced Fat Milk?
It depends on your goals. Sweetened Condensed Milk has 433.33 calories, while 2% Reduced Fat Milk has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sweetened Condensed Milk vegan?
No, Sweetened Condensed Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sweetened Condensed Milk and 2% Reduced Fat Milk?
There is a difference of 383 calories per 100g between the two products.
