Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweetened Condensed Milk vs Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweetened Condensed Milk

Sweetened Condensed Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives

Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
133 kcal
55.6g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
10g
11.1g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweetened Condensed Milk and Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweetened Condensed Milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 200 more calories per 100g than Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweetened Condensed Milk contains significantly more sugar (55.6g) compared to the milder Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweetened Condensed Milk offers a protein boost with 11.1g per 100g, outperforming Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweetened Condensed Milk or Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives?

It depends on your goals. Sweetened Condensed Milk has 333 calories, while Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives has 133 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweetened Condensed Milk vegan?

No, Sweetened Condensed Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweetened Condensed Milk and Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.