Head-to-Head Analysis

Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds vs Orange Cranberry Scones

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds

Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Orange Cranberry Scones

Orange Cranberry Scones

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
566.7 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
36.7g
Sugars
28.3g
40g
Fat
15.6g
6.7g
Protein
4.4g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds and Orange Cranberry Scones side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 167 more calories per 100g than Orange Cranberry Scones. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds contains significantly more sugar (36.67g) compared to the milder Orange Cranberry Scones (28.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Orange Cranberry Scones is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Orange Cranberry Scones in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds or Orange Cranberry Scones?

It depends on your goals. Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds has 566.67 calories, while Orange Cranberry Scones has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds vegan?

No, Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Swiss Dark Chocolate With Almonds and Orange Cranberry Scones?

There is a difference of 167 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.