Head-to-Head Analysis

Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa vs Crisp Apple

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa

Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crisp Apple

Crisp Apple

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
410 kcal
Energy
11.3 kcal
71.8g
Sugars
1.4g
6.4g
Fat
0g
2.6g
Protein
0g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa and Crisp Apple side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa is the more energy-dense option here, packing 399 more calories per 100g than Crisp Apple. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa contains significantly more sugar (71.8g) compared to the milder Crisp Apple (1.41g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crisp Apple is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa offers a protein boost with 2.56g per 100g, outperforming Crisp Apple in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa or Crisp Apple?

It depends on your goals. Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa has 410 calories, while Crisp Apple has 11.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa vegan?

No, Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Swiss miss milk chocolate flavored hot cocoa and Crisp Apple?

There is a difference of 399 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.