Head-to-Head Analysis

Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa vs Hazelnut Wafer Rolls

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa

Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Hazelnut Wafer Rolls

Hazelnut Wafer Rolls

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
92.3 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
0.8g
Sugars
39.3g
3.1g
Fat
21.4g
10g
Protein
3.6g
1.1g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa and Hazelnut Wafer Rolls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa is the clear winner. With 372 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa takes the lead with only 0.76923076923077g of sugar per 100g, whereas Hazelnut Wafer Rolls contains 39.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Hazelnut Wafer Rolls in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa or Hazelnut Wafer Rolls?

Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa vegan?

No, Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Taco Filling Hearty Veggie Picadillo In Red Salsa and Hazelnut Wafer Rolls?

There is a difference of 372 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.