Head-to-Head Analysis

Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta vs Original Kettle Style Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta

Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Kettle Style Potato Chips

Original Kettle Style Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
362 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
2.9g
Sugars
0g
6.7g
Fat
32.1g
14.3g
Protein
3.6g
2.4g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta and Original Kettle Style Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta is the clear winner. With 138 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta contains significantly more sugar (2.86g) compared to the milder Original Kettle Style Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Kettle Style Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Original Kettle Style Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta or Original Kettle Style Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta has 362 calories, while Original Kettle Style Potato Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta vegan?

No, Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tangle Creamy Mushroom Pasta and Original Kettle Style Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 138 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.