Head-to-Head Analysis

Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural vs 10” Chocolate Cake Filled with Chocolate Mousse

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural

Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural

Not Vegan
VS
Package of 10” Chocolate Cake Filled with Chocolate Mousse

10” Chocolate Cake Filled with Chocolate Mousse

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
150 kcal
Energy
345 kcal
1g
Sugars
39.8g
6g
Fat
15.9g
3g
Protein
3.5g
0.8g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural and 10” Chocolate Cake Filled with Chocolate Mousse side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural is the clear winner. With 195 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural takes the lead with only 1g of sugar per 100g, whereas 10” Chocolate Cake Filled with Chocolate Mousse contains 39.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural or 10” Chocolate Cake Filled with Chocolate Mousse?

Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural vegan?

No, Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Taralli by flora italian snack cracker all natural and 10” Chocolate Cake Filled with Chocolate Mousse?

There is a difference of 195 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.