Taralli Classico vs chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Taralli Classico
chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Taralli Classico and chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Taralli Classico is the more energy-dense option here, packing 77 more calories per 100g than chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Taralli Classico takes the lead with only 2g of sugar per 100g, whereas chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels contains 46.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Taralli Classico offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Taralli Classico or chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels?
It depends on your goals. Taralli Classico has 477 calories, while chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Taralli Classico vegan?
No, Taralli Classico is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Taralli Classico and chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels?
There is a difference of 77 calories per 100g between the two products.
