Head-to-Head Analysis

Teriyaki Atlantic salmon vs Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Teriyaki Atlantic salmon

Teriyaki Atlantic salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar

Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
280 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
16.2g
Sugars
0g
12g
Fat
32.1g
18g
Protein
7.1g
1.4g
Salt
3.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Teriyaki Atlantic salmon and Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Teriyaki Atlantic salmon is the clear winner. With 220 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Teriyaki Atlantic salmon contains significantly more sugar (16.2g) compared to the milder Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Teriyaki Atlantic salmon offers a protein boost with 18g per 100g, outperforming Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Teriyaki Atlantic salmon or Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar?

It depends on your goals. Teriyaki Atlantic salmon has 280 calories, while Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Teriyaki Atlantic salmon vegan?

No, Teriyaki Atlantic salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Teriyaki Atlantic salmon and Style potato chips sea salt & vinegar?

There is a difference of 220 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.