Head-to-Head Analysis

Teriyaki Beef Jerky vs plant-based seven grain crispy tenders

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Teriyaki Beef Jerky

Teriyaki Beef Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of plant-based seven grain crispy tenders

plant-based seven grain crispy tenders

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321 kcal
Energy
176.5 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
0g
5.4g
Fat
7.8g
46.4g
Protein
13.7g
7.4g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Teriyaki Beef Jerky and plant-based seven grain crispy tenders side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Teriyaki Beef Jerky is the more energy-dense option here, packing 145 more calories per 100g than plant-based seven grain crispy tenders. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Teriyaki Beef Jerky contains significantly more sugar (17.9g) compared to the milder plant-based seven grain crispy tenders (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, plant-based seven grain crispy tenders is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Teriyaki Beef Jerky offers a protein boost with 46.4g per 100g, outperforming plant-based seven grain crispy tenders in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Teriyaki Beef Jerky or plant-based seven grain crispy tenders?

It depends on your goals. Teriyaki Beef Jerky has 321 calories, while plant-based seven grain crispy tenders has 176.4706 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Teriyaki Beef Jerky vegan?

No, Teriyaki Beef Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Teriyaki Beef Jerky and plant-based seven grain crispy tenders?

There is a difference of 145 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.