Head-to-Head Analysis

TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS vs Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS

TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops

Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
176 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
6.8g
Sugars
0g
4.7g
Fat
0g
13.5g
Protein
0g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS and Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS is the more energy-dense option here, packing 176 more calories per 100g than Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS contains significantly more sugar (6.76g) compared to the milder Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS offers a protein boost with 13.5g per 100g, outperforming Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS or Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops?

It depends on your goals. TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS has 176 calories, while Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS vegan?

No, TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between TERIYAKI CHICKEN BOWLS and Kid's Propolis Throat Soothing Pops?

There is a difference of 176 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.