Head-to-Head Analysis

Tesco's triple chocolate curls vs Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tesco's triple chocolate curls

Tesco's triple chocolate curls

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips

Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
527 kcal
Energy
412 kcal
55.5g
Sugars
17.6g
28.9g
Fat
19.1g
6.3g
Protein
23.5g
0.1g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tesco's triple chocolate curls and Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tesco's triple chocolate curls is the more energy-dense option here, packing 115 more calories per 100g than Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tesco's triple chocolate curls contains significantly more sugar (55.5g) compared to the milder Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips (17.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tesco's triple chocolate curls or Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Tesco's triple chocolate curls has 527 calories, while Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips has 412 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tesco's triple chocolate curls vegan?

No, Tesco's triple chocolate curls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tesco's triple chocolate curls and Fody kettle cooked barbecue potato chips?

There is a difference of 115 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.