Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon vs Milk chocolate gems
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon
Milk chocolate gems
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon and Milk chocolate gems side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon is the clear winner. With 333 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon takes the lead with only 0.704g of sugar per 100g, whereas Milk chocolate gems contains 46.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon offers a protein boost with 16.9g per 100g, outperforming Milk chocolate gems in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon or Milk chocolate gems?
Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon vegan?
No, Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Texas Originals Beef Filets Wrapped In Hickory Mesquite Bacon and Milk chocolate gems?
There is a difference of 333 calories per 100g between the two products.
