Head-to-Head Analysis

Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops vs Snacks Mango And Raspberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops

Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Snacks Mango And Raspberry

Snacks Mango And Raspberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
203 kcal
Energy
80 kcal
0g
Sugars
15g
13.2g
Fat
0g
18.5g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops and Snacks Mango And Raspberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops is the more energy-dense option here, packing 123 more calories per 100g than Snacks Mango And Raspberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Snacks Mango And Raspberry contains 15g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops offers a protein boost with 18.5g per 100g, outperforming Snacks Mango And Raspberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops or Snacks Mango And Raspberry?

It depends on your goals. Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops has 203 calories, while Snacks Mango And Raspberry has 80 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops vegan?

No, Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Texas Style Boneless Pork Ribeye Chops and Snacks Mango And Raspberry?

There is a difference of 123 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.