Head-to-Head Analysis

Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage vs Sweet Crunchy Rice Snack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage

Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Crunchy Rice Snack

Sweet Crunchy Rice Snack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
282 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
0g
Sugars
40g
22.4g
Fat
0g
18.8g
Protein
0g
1.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage and Sweet Crunchy Rice Snack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage is the clear winner. With 118 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Crunchy Rice Snack contains 40g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Crunchy Rice Snack in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage or Sweet Crunchy Rice Snack?

Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage vegan?

No, Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Texas Style Smokehouse Pork & Beef Smoked Sausage and Sweet Crunchy Rice Snack?

There is a difference of 118 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.