Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) vs ricanelas
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Textured Soya Protein (Defatted)
ricanelas
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) and ricanelas side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) is the clear winner. With 437 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas ricanelas contains 25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) or ricanelas?
Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) vegan?
No, Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Textured Soya Protein (Defatted) and ricanelas?
There is a difference of 437 calories per 100g between the two products.
