Head-to-Head Analysis

Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce vs Buffalo Mayo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce

Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Buffalo Mayo

Buffalo Mayo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
194.4 kcal
Energy
643 kcal
27.8g
Sugars
0g
5.6g
Fat
71.4g
5.6g
Protein
0g
2.1g
Salt
2.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce and Buffalo Mayo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce is the clear winner. With 449 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce contains significantly more sugar (27.777777777778g) compared to the milder Buffalo Mayo (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Buffalo Mayo is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce offers a protein boost with 5.5555555555556g per 100g, outperforming Buffalo Mayo in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce or Buffalo Mayo?

It depends on your goals. Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce has 194.44444444444 calories, while Buffalo Mayo has 643 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce vegan?

No, Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce and Buffalo Mayo?

There is a difference of 449 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.