Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce vs Honey french dressing contains sugar
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce

Honey french dressing contains sugar
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce and Honey french dressing contains sugar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce is the more energy-dense option here, packing 193 more calories per 100g than Honey french dressing contains sugar. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce contains significantly more sugar (27.777777777778g) compared to the milder Honey french dressing contains sugar (12g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Honey french dressing contains sugar is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce offers a protein boost with 5.5555555555556g per 100g, outperforming Honey french dressing contains sugar in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce or Honey french dressing contains sugar?
It depends on your goals. Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce has 194.44444444444 calories, while Honey french dressing contains sugar has 1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce vegan?
No, Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Thai inspirations sweet chili peanut sauce and Honey french dressing contains sugar?
There is a difference of 193 calories per 100g between the two products.




