Head-to-Head Analysis

Thai Peanut Satay Sauce vs Walden farms, blue cheese dressing

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Thai Peanut Satay Sauce

Thai Peanut Satay Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Walden farms, blue cheese dressing

Walden farms, blue cheese dressing

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
235 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
14.7g
Sugars
0g
13.2g
Fat
0g
5.9g
Protein
0g
2g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thai Peanut Satay Sauce and Walden farms, blue cheese dressing side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Thai Peanut Satay Sauce is the more energy-dense option here, packing 235 more calories per 100g than Walden farms, blue cheese dressing. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Thai Peanut Satay Sauce contains significantly more sugar (14.7g) compared to the milder Walden farms, blue cheese dressing (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Walden farms, blue cheese dressing is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Thai Peanut Satay Sauce offers a protein boost with 5.88g per 100g, outperforming Walden farms, blue cheese dressing in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thai Peanut Satay Sauce or Walden farms, blue cheese dressing?

It depends on your goals. Thai Peanut Satay Sauce has 235 calories, while Walden farms, blue cheese dressing has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thai Peanut Satay Sauce vegan?

No, Thai Peanut Satay Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thai Peanut Satay Sauce and Walden farms, blue cheese dressing?

There is a difference of 235 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.