Head-to-Head Analysis

Thai style coconut chicken vs Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Thai style coconut chicken

Thai style coconut chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips

Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
1.6g
Sugars
10.7g
7.8g
Fat
25g
4.9g
Protein
7.1g
0.7g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thai style coconut chicken and Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thai style coconut chicken is the clear winner. With 394 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Thai style coconut chicken takes the lead with only 1.63g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips contains 10.71g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thai style coconut chicken or Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips?

Thai style coconut chicken appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Thai style coconut chicken vegan?

No, Thai style coconut chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thai style coconut chicken and Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips?

There is a difference of 394 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.