Head-to-Head Analysis

Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken vs Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken

Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives

Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
119 kcal
Energy
133 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
0g
5.6g
Fat
10g
13.4g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken and Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken is the clear winner. With 14 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken contains significantly more sugar (2.23g) compared to the milder Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken offers a protein boost with 13.4g per 100g, outperforming Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken or Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives?

It depends on your goals. Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken has 119 calories, while Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives has 133 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken vegan?

No, Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thai-Style Red Curry Chicken and Organic Medium Pitted Ripe Olives?

There is a difference of 14 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.