Head-to-Head Analysis

That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar vs Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar

That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling

Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
370 kcal
62.9g
Sugars
31.5g
0g
Fat
11.1g
2.9g
Protein
5.6g
0.1g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar and Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar is the clear winner. With 84 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar contains significantly more sugar (62.9g) compared to the milder Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling (31.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar or Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling?

It depends on your goals. That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar has 286 calories, while Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling has 370 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar vegan?

No, That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between That's It Apple + Cherry Fruit Bar and Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling?

There is a difference of 84 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.