Head-to-Head Analysis

Theo, milk chocolate vs Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Theo, milk chocolate

Theo, milk chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat

Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
217 kcal
12g
Sugars
0g
12g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Theo, milk chocolate and Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Theo, milk chocolate is the clear winner. With 57 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Theo, milk chocolate contains significantly more sugar (12g) compared to the milder Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Theo, milk chocolate offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Theo, milk chocolate or Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat?

It depends on your goals. Theo, milk chocolate has 160 calories, while Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat has 217 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Theo, milk chocolate vegan?

No, Theo, milk chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Theo, milk chocolate and Tropical beat sugar free gum, tropical beat?

There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.