Head-to-Head Analysis

Thick Sirloin Chops vs Original cocorolls

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Thick Sirloin Chops

Thick Sirloin Chops

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original cocorolls

Original cocorolls

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
134 kcal
Energy
464.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
28.6g
5.4g
Fat
17.9g
20.5g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thick Sirloin Chops and Original cocorolls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thick Sirloin Chops is the clear winner. With 330 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Thick Sirloin Chops takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original cocorolls contains 28.571428571429g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Thick Sirloin Chops offers a protein boost with 20.5g per 100g, outperforming Original cocorolls in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thick Sirloin Chops or Original cocorolls?

Thick Sirloin Chops appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Thick Sirloin Chops vegan?

No, Thick Sirloin Chops is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thick Sirloin Chops and Original cocorolls?

There is a difference of 330 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.