Head-to-Head Analysis

Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat vs Original Biltong

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat

Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Biltong

Original Biltong

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
286 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
7.1g
0g
Protein
57.1g
0g
Salt
3.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat and Original Biltong side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat is the clear winner. With 286 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat or Original Biltong?

It depends on your goals. Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat has 0 calories, while Original Biltong has 286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat vegan?

No, Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thin Sliced Chicken Breasts with Rib Meat and Original Biltong?

There is a difference of 286 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.